About

Strategic Environmental Assessment Community of Practice

Strategic Environmental Assessment Community of Practice

The SEA Community of Practice seeks to:

  • share knowledge and experience of strategic approaches/SEA in the Australian/ New Zealand context
  • build a basic understanding of strategic approaches and SEA as terms and concepts with good practice examples
  • identify potential champions for strategic approaches in government and the private sector
  • highlight where there may be upcoming opportunities for a more strategic approach in planning, impact assessment and/or decision-making
  • establish a ‘community of practice’ for strategic approaches to impact assessment.

Resources

IAIA19 Lessons learned from SEAs in Australia - Combined presentations

This interactive panel session at the Brisbane IAIA19, chaired by Carolyn Cameron, presented emergent ‘big-picture’ lessons gleaned from a decade of SEA practice in Australia, illustrated with case studies.

  • SEA using landscape as a driving concept – Garry Middle
  • What difference does SEA make anyway? – Tanya Burdett
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment: a regulator’s perspective – Bruce Edwards
  • Implementing SEA: lesson learned – Peter Hemphill

SEA: Lessons Learned from Australia?

EIANZ 18; Reimagine an alternative landscape scale approach to national environmental law: Extract from Notes from SEA Session

  • Extract from notes from SEA session at EIANZ conference in Sydney 2018
  • Panel session: Lachlan Wilkinson, Chair: Carolyn Cameron, Tessa Lavers, Paul Elton, NSW Biodiversity Conservation Trust, Nick Taylor Clayton Utz and James Trieze, ACF

Notes from SEA session

International SEA Workshop, 2019, Gold Coast

Building on IAIA19 in Brisbane, the SEA Community of Practice brought together 25 practitioners, regulators and academics from across Australia with visiting international experts Thomas Fischer from the UK, Maria Partidario from Portugal and Amanda Chisholm from Scotland

The one day Gold Coast workshop was underwritten by EIANZ’s New Initiative Fund. Seed funding for this workshop was provided by EIANZ’s New Initiative Fund.

The proceedings provide international insights along with applications in the Australian context.

Post-conference workshop

Getting Strategic with Impact Assessment, April 2020 - Webinar Slides

Slides extracted from the SEA Community of Practice's submission on the EPBC Act Review; part of EIANZ EPBC Act Review webinar series; presented by Carolyn Cameron.

Impact Assessment Webinar

EPBC Act Review Chapter 3b; SEA Community of Practice submission - April, 2020

The SEA Community of Practice made recommendations about 6 topics for consideration in the review of the EPBC ACT:

  • [Bio]regional Planning
  • Strengthening Strategic Assessments
  • Assessing and Managing Cumulative Impacts
  • Matters of National Environmental Significance
  • Standards for Assessment
  • Implementation Issues

EIANZ EPBC Act Review - SEA Section

The SEA Good Practice Guidance | 2018

The SEA Good Practice Guidance compiles information developed by the SEA Community of Practice from 2016-2018. Compiled by an ANU final year student intern, it importantly recognises there are two types of SEA used in Australia, a planning SEA and an assessment SEA. Good practice principles and the steps in SEA are described and applied to a case study for a framework SEA for pumped hydro.

SEA Good Practice Guidance

Just how ‘strategic’ are Strategic Environmental Assessments? | Mitchell Ross, JCU | 2019

This study involved an extensive literature review focussing on strategic thinking in SEA and the subsequent development of a unique set of criteria to assess the strategic nature of Australian Strategic Assessments completed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999).

The study found that the Australian system is not always truly strategic. Incorporation of sustainability aspects and adaptiveness were strengths of the Australian system in most instances, while components such as cumulative impact assessment and assessment of alternatives were often absent or insufficiently addressed. To make SAs more strategic would require enhancing existing legislation and endorsement criteria with more explicit guidance on developing strategically focused SEA

Download the presentation